Search Results

How the UN's bias and inaction compromise its foundational mission 13 February 2024 By: YNET Opinion: The IDF's discovery of a Hamas tunnel below UNRWA's headquarters in Gaza exemplify how to UN continues to remain idle on issues it holds itself responsible for. Following the path of the League of Nations before it, the United Nations is similarly treading a path marked by partiality, compromising its fundamental mission of peacekeeping, especially in the context of the war between Israel and Hamas. The discovery by the Israel Defense Forces, of a Hamas tunnel under the UNRWA headquarters in Gaza , as well as an operational room dedicated to servers belonging to the terrorist organization, reveals not only a security breach but also a moral failing on the part of the UN, which is incapable of distancing itself from the influence of Hamas and its ideology. These events highlight the UN's inability to deal with the various actors in the war between Israel and the Hamas terrorist group objectively and fairly. The organization's silence and delayed reactions to the atrocities committed by Hamas, including sexual violence against Israeli civilians, contrast with the speed of its condemnations in other contexts. This reluctance to recognize and condemn terrorist acts when they target Israel, fuels this bias, thus undermining the UN's credibility in its fight against terrorism. The refusal of the UNRWA Commissioner-General, Philippe Lazzarini, to acknowledge Hamas's influence over the organization demonstrates dangerous complacency and the moral bankruptcy of the UN agency. UNRWA, mandated to assist Palestinian refugees, thus finds itself exploited, its resources diverted to terrorist activities, raising questions about the agency's funding. As the United States is deciding whether to continue funding UNRWA, members of the European Union should do the same. In another vein, the handling of sexual violence starkly illustrates the UN's double standards since October 7th. While the organization is quick to denounce minor incidents in other circumstances, it shows astonishing restraint when the victims are Israeli. This silence is not only a betrayal of universal values of protection for victims of sexual violence but also a demonstration of how ideology distorts the UN's mission. The influence of the Islamist and Muslim Brotherhood ideologies is not limited to the UN or the management of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. It is also evident in their interactions with anti-racist and feminist movements, using their terminology to weaken democracies and absolve terrorist actors like Hamas. This hijacking of social activism for specific political agendas reveals a vulnerability of the West and the UN to ideological manipulations, endangering democratic societies. The role of Qatar and other Islamic states in spreading this ideology through the funding of academic institutions in the United States, in particular, underscores a well-oiled strategy aimed at reshaping the discourse on human rights and colonialism. By systematically presenting terrorist groups as victims of oppression, these efforts seek to immunize these actors against legitimate criticism, while blaming their actions on the supposed colonial policies of the West. Faced with these challenges, the UN is at a crossroads. It can choose to reaffirm its commitment to impartiality, transparency, and the universality of human rights, or continue to be influenced by partisan ideologies that undermine its integrity and mission. To regain its credibility and legitimacy, the UN must distance itself from political and ideological influences that compromise its objectivity and reevaluate its control and accountability mechanisms. The current situation demands deep introspection from the UN. It is imperative that the organization reexamines its practices, policies, and affiliations to ensure it remains a tool dedicated to nations and not a supra-administration held hostage by dictatorial states. By: Hillel Portugais-de Almeida is a political analyst. <- Previous Read full article Next -> More Insights 7 Ways Hamas Exploits Palestinian Civilians in Gaza Antisemitism defined: Why opposing the Jewish people's right to self-determination is antisemitic What You Need to Know About Israel’s Humanitarian Aid To Gaza Fatah responds to Hamas criticism of new formation of PA government ‘without consulting Hamas’ Surprise jump in Gazan support for 2-state solution, while still in favor of Oct 7 attack Hamas' Most Horrific Weapon of War: 5 Takeaways from UN Report on Sexual Violence Against Israelis Latest Video Clips The History of Israel This Muslim Israeli Woman Is the Future of the Middle East Natasha Hausdorff responds to the content of the House of Commons Gaza Debate. Its time to face the hard truth that you're being played as a sacrificial fool by terrorists. Peace cannot be achieved with those who desire war and jihad instead. 'Awful Things Happening In Israel Nothing To Do With British Jews'

Russia Has Pledged To Extend Political Support To Hamas 18 February 2024 By: MEMRI Left: Hamas delegation members with Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Mikhail Bogdanov during January 2024 Moscow visit; Right: Hamas delegation members with Bogdanov during October 2023 Moscow visit (Images: T.me/hamasps, January 19, 2024; October 26, 2023) Online Daily 'Rai Al-Youm': Russia Has Pledged To Extend Political Support To Hamas, And To Place Its UNSC Veto Power At Hamas’ Disposal According to a February 10, 2024 report in the online daily Rai Al-Youm, owned by Palestinian journalist Abd Al-Bari Atwan, Russia has recently conveyed its support to Hamas and the other Palestinian resistance factions, and pledged to place its UN Security Council veto power at Hamas’ disposal and to aid it in various ways, excluding the provision of weapons. The report states further that Russian officials expressed gratitude to the Hamas leadership for causing the U.S. and the West to shift their attention from the war in Ukraine to the war in Gaza. Some of these messages may have been relayed to the Hamas leadership through a Hamas delegation, headed by the movement’s international relations chief Moussa Abu Marzouq, that visited Moscow on January 19, 2024. The delegation, which also included Hamas Political Bureau member Bassem Na’im and the Hamas representative in Moscow, met with Russian Deputy Foreign Minister and Putin’s Special Representative to the Middle East and Africa, Mikhail Bogdanov. According to a report published by Hamas, the delegation “held political consultations with the Russian foreign ministry about ways to [achieve] a ceasefire” in Gaza and “in order to clarify the movement’s position and policy” regarding the Israeli hostages it is holding. The report adds that the delegation “stressed the Palestinian people’s right to achieve freedom and return, and its right to oppose the Zionist occupation by every possible means.” Bogdanov, for his part, “expressed his country’s support for the Palestinian people’s rights and described the efforts it is making vis-à-vis the relevant elements to promote a ceasefire” in Gaza. [1] It should be noted that this is the Hamas delegation’s second visit to Russia since the October 7, 2023 Hamas terrorist attack. The same delegation visited Russia on October 26, 2023, less than three weeks after the attack. [2] These visits are a direct continuation of Russia’s ongoing relations with Hamas in recent years, which included multiple visits to Russia by Hamas leaders who stressed the movement’s “right” to “oppose the Israeli occupation by every means,” i.e., to carry out terrorist attacks, and also expressed support for Russia’s foreign policy. [3] gainst this backdrop, former Hamas official Mustafa Al-Lidawi disclosed in an article that, in the months since the outbreak of the Gaza war, Russian President Putin has conveyed messages of support and praise for Hamas and even expressed his “admiration for the operations of the Palestinian resistance.” Lidawi called on Putin to complement this praise with practical and serious, rather than theoretical, positions. This report presents the Rai Al-Youm report on Russia’s messages to Hamas, and translated excerpts from Al-Lidawi’s article. Rai Al-Youm: Russia Clarified To Hamas That It's On Its Side And Ready To Assist It In Additional Ways, Excluding The Provision Of Weapons As stated, on February 10, 2024, Rai Al-Youm reported on messages of support conveyed by Russia to the Hamas leadership. The report states that Russia’s consultations and coordination with the leaders of the Palestinian resistance factions indicate that this country does not care how Israel and the U.S. classify these factions, and adds: "The Hamas political leadership recently received a message from Russian diplomatic corridors, conveying that 'we are on your side and will back you in the Security Council.' Senior Hamas official Dr. Moussa Abu Marzouq heard this from prominent figures in the [Russian] foreign ministry and defense ministry when he visited Moscow. [Hamas leader] Ismail Haniya also heard this, from the veteran and leading Russian diplomat [Mikhail] Bogdanov." The report states further: “In Moscow, a general in the defense ministry asked Abu Marzouq directly, 'How [can we] serve you? What can we supply you with, other than weapons?' From the context, it was possible to understand that Moscow wants to exhibit more openness toward the Palestinian resistance, but does not want to cross too many red lines, because the right wing in Israel, which currently controls [this country], 'is very sensitive' and 'it is likely to turn more firmly against [Russia] in Ukraine,' as a senior Russian official remarked to a senior Palestinian official. Abu Marzouq, with his incisive wisdom, expressed gratitude for 'the Russian initiatives' and noted that the Palestinian resistance is grateful for Russia's political support and 'anticipates more.' Regarding weapons, [the Russians] were told that the Hamas movement is content with the backing that Russia provides to [Hamas’] partner, the Lebanese resistance [i.e. Hizbullah]." The Russians Thanked Hamas And The Other Palestinian Factions For Causing The U.S. Planes To Leave Ukraine For The Gaza Strip Noting that "the openness towards Moscow is 'a real and substantive achievement' according to the criteria of Abu Marzouq and the rest of Hamas’ diplomatic team," the report goes on to state that "Moscow recently added the [Palestinian] Islamic Jihad [PIJ] to its contact and consultation array. Even before this, in a meeting in Doha, the Russians told the Hamas leadership that they appreciated the role of the resistance factions in engaging some 5,000 Western and American planes that had [previously] spied on Russia and its operations in Ukraine but have now been redeployed to the Gaza Strip." Russia Promised Hamas Leaders To Place Its UNSC Veto Power At Their Disposal; Warned Them Arab Countries Are Plotting Against Them The report adds that, "behind the scenes, the Russians made a commitment to the Palestinian resistance: ‘our veto [power] at the Security Council will be at your disposal.’ This is a direct commitment by Moscow that the Russian veto will oppose any American or Western proposal aimed at holding the Palestinian people responsible. The impression in the resistance circles to date is that Moscow has fulfilled this commitment and used the veto [power] at least three times 'to protect the resistance and the people of Gaza' from dangerous draft resolutions.” The article concludes by quoting Russian diplomats as saying that "the Americans deliberately eliminated the International Quartet in order to deprive Russia of its role in the regional peace process," and that "a prominent Russian military official warned representatives of the Palestinian resistance that 'some Arab countries are plotting against you' and constitute a significant element 'in support of the Israeli aggression.'"[4] Former Hamas Official: Putin Is Grateful To Hamas For Drawing America Away From Ukraine; He Should Reward Hamas For This In a January 2, 2024 article, Palestinian writer and researcher Dr. Mustafa Lidawi, formerly Hamas’ representative in Syria, Lebanon and Iran, wrote that the war in Gaza caused the U.S. and the West to shift their attention from Ukraine to the Gaza Strip, and that Russian President Vladimir Putin used this to increase his attacks on Ukraine and attain significant achievements on the battlefield. He added that Putin should reward Hamas for providing him with this opportunity, and stressed that the Palestinians will not suffice with the messages of gratitude and appreciation that Putin has already conveyed to Hamas through mediators, but expect more tangible assistance. Lidawi wrote: “[Russia] may be the one that benefits the most from the war against Gaza. It took advantage of America’s and the European countries’ preoccupation with Israel’s cruel aggression against Gaza to boost its forces in Ukraine and direct all its military power against it… It [also] increased its precise attacks on hundreds of sensitive facilities and strategic targets, whose destruction influences the course of the war and weakens the Ukrainian home front, and [Russia] achieved in the last three months what it had not managed to achieve in a whole year of military action. “Russian President Vladimir Putin used the new international circumstances to take serious and quiet action on the various fronts in Ukraine: the deep ones, the far ones and those near the Russian borders, taking fierce revenge on the Ukrainian leadership… He understood that the American and Western strategic supply lines [to Ukraine] had been severed, the weapons shipments had stopped, along with the support and assistance campaigns, that the media war against his country was waning and that the Ukrainian leadership had grown weaker in the conflict and was unable to defend [its] territory… He took advantage of this situation to attack, occupy, bomb, destroy and achieve many [goals] he had dreamed of and hoped for… “The Palestinians, for their part, understand that they are the ones who provided the Russian president and his country with this golden opportunity to achieve his goals. [They understand] that, if the U.S. and Europe had not been preoccupied with the war in Gaza and had not turned to support, aid and defend the Zionist regime, [Putin] would not have been able to recover what he had lost… and regain his deterrence and advantage. The U.S. and its allies would have probably continued to exhaust Russia, crush it, destroy its economy and isolate it... “In return, the Palestinians expect the Russian leadership to acknowledge the favor and reward them with an equal or greater favor: by aiding and supporting them, backing them and assisting them, and thwarting the plots against them and the decisions aimed at harming them and eliminating their cause. But only if [Russia’s] positions are not theoretical, weak, vague and ineffectual, but rather serious and practical [positions] that will frighten and alarm the enemy, and force it to withdraw, halt the war and stop the attacks. “The Palestinians are probably aware of the gratitude felt by the Russian president towards their resistance [forces, i.e., Hamas], of his praise for [Hamas’] steadfastness, and of his admiration for its operations and for the [Palestinian] people: its patience, steadfastness and willingness to give, and the way it embraces the resistance. The Palestinians know that [Putin] conveyed these positions of his through mediators and allies. But the Palestinians believe that this gratitude is not enough. Theoretical support is useless and is powerless to change reality. It also seems that [Putin’s] admiration and praise are secret, and he is afraid to let them be known, especially by the [Zionist] entity…”[5] <- Previous Read full article Next -> More Insights 7 Ways Hamas Exploits Palestinian Civilians in Gaza Antisemitism defined: Why opposing the Jewish people's right to self-determination is antisemitic What You Need to Know About Israel’s Humanitarian Aid To Gaza Fatah responds to Hamas criticism of new formation of PA government ‘without consulting Hamas’ Surprise jump in Gazan support for 2-state solution, while still in favor of Oct 7 attack Hamas' Most Horrific Weapon of War: 5 Takeaways from UN Report on Sexual Violence Against Israelis Latest Video Clips The History of Israel This Muslim Israeli Woman Is the Future of the Middle East Natasha Hausdorff responds to the content of the House of Commons Gaza Debate. Its time to face the hard truth that you're being played as a sacrificial fool by terrorists. Peace cannot be achieved with those who desire war and jihad instead. 'Awful Things Happening In Israel Nothing To Do With British Jews'

Fatah responds to Hamas criticism of new formation of PA government ‘without consulting Hamas’ 16 March 2024 By: @FirasPalestine (Political Analyst • Palestinian Nationalist, Ramallah) Palestinian National Liberation Movement "Fatah" affirmed that whoever caused Israel's reoccupation of the Gaza Strip, and caused the Nakba that the Palestinian people are experiencing, especially in the Gaza Strip, does not have the right to dictate national priorities, stressing that the real disconnect from reality and the Palestinian people is the leadership of the movement. Hamas, which until this moment has not felt the magnitude of the catastrophe that our oppressed people are experiencing in the Gaza Strip and in the rest of the Palestinian territories. Fatah expressed its astonishment and disapproval at Hamas’ talk of exclusion and division, and wondered whether Hamas consulted the Palestinian leadership or any Palestinian national party when it made its decision to undertake the adventure of last October 7, which led to a catastrophe more horrific and cruel than the catastrophe of 1948? Did Hamas consult the Palestinian leadership, while it is now negotiating with Israel and offering it concessions after concessions, and that it has no goal other than for its leadership to receive guarantees for its personal security, and to try to reach an agreement with Netanyahu again to maintain its divisive role in Gaza and the Palestinian arena? The question is whether Hamas consulted anyone when it carried out its 2007 coup. On Palestinian national legitimacy in 2007, it rejected all initiatives to end the division. Fatah affirmed that President Mahmoud Abbas has the right, in accordance with the Basic Law, to do everything that is in the interest of the Palestinian people, stressing that the President’s assignment to Dr. Muhammad Mustafa falls at the heart of the President’s political and legal responsibilities, and that the priorities set in the assignment are the priorities of the Palestinian people, and every rational person who is not separated from his people and from the reality of the terrible tragedy experienced by our people who are exposed to great injustice in the Gaza Strip, they realize this, stressing that the priority of all Palestinians today is to stop the war immediately, prevent displacement, provide relief to our afflicted people, rebuild the Gaza Strip, end the division, and reunify the Palestinian homeland, and it is as it demonstrates. Hamas said in its statement today that the above is not its priority. Fatah confirmed that the Prime Minister-designate, Dr. Muhammad Mustafa, is armed with the national agenda and not with false agendas that have brought nothing but woes to the Palestinian people and have not achieved a single achievement for them. Fatah asked: Does Hamas want us to appoint a prime minister from Iran or for Tehran to appoint him for us? Fatah criticized the actions and practices of the Hamas leadership and its behavior towards the genocidal war, noting that it seems that the comfortable life that this leadership lives in seven-star hotels has blinded it from what is right, wondering why most of Hamas’ leaders live abroad, and why they and their families fled and left the Palestinian people to face... A brutal war of extermination without any protection. Fatah called on the leadership of the Hamas movement to stop its policy of being dependent on foreign agendas, and to return to the national side in order to stop the war and save our people and our cause from liquidation, and in order to provide relief to our people and rebuild Gaza, leading to complete withdrawal from the land of the State of Palestine, with Jerusalem as its capital. <- Previous Read full article Next -> More Insights 7 Ways Hamas Exploits Palestinian Civilians in Gaza Antisemitism defined: Why opposing the Jewish people's right to self-determination is antisemitic What You Need to Know About Israel’s Humanitarian Aid To Gaza Fatah responds to Hamas criticism of new formation of PA government ‘without consulting Hamas’ Surprise jump in Gazan support for 2-state solution, while still in favor of Oct 7 attack Hamas' Most Horrific Weapon of War: 5 Takeaways from UN Report on Sexual Violence Against Israelis Latest Video Clips The History of Israel This Muslim Israeli Woman Is the Future of the Middle East Natasha Hausdorff responds to the content of the House of Commons Gaza Debate. Its time to face the hard truth that you're being played as a sacrificial fool by terrorists. Peace cannot be achieved with those who desire war and jihad instead. 'Awful Things Happening In Israel Nothing To Do With British Jews'

Israel at the Crossroads of Conflict and International Law October 7th War in Gaza In the wake of the October 7 attack by Hamas, the question of proportionality in Israel's response under international law has become a focal point. The attack, resulting in significant Israeli casualties and characterized by Hamas's use of rockets, drones, and ground warfare, has been condemned as a terrorist act. The concept of proportionality in international humanitarian law (IHL) necessitates that the military advantage anticipated from an attack not be excessive in relation to the expected civilian harm. However, the application of this principle in the context of asymmetric warfare, such as the Israel-Hamas conflict, is complex. Israel's military campaign aims to neutralize threats posed by Hamas while adhering to IHL. The principle of proportionality, in this case, is nuanced, considering the scale of the threat and the need to respond effectively to a terror organization. The conflict has raised critical questions about applying international law in situations where a state is combating a recognized terrorist organization, challenging traditional interpretations of proportionality in armed conflict. References Related Videos References References Proportionality in the Israel-Gaza Conflict: A Legal Primer What International Law Has to Say About the Israel-Hamas War Reletaed Videos Related Videos Hamas, the Palestinian Islamic Jihad, and their use of hospitals. Israel action - analyzed by international law expert The complexity of context Israel is doing everything it can to keep civilians safe The Humanitarian Passageway - 12.11.23 Who is right in the Israel Hamas conflict Load More

Israel issues warning to UNSC over Iran's weapon shipments to Hezbollah 23 February 2024 By: i24news A drone is carried on a truck in front of a portrait of Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei just outside Tehran, Iran. AP Photo/Vahid Salemi Katz asserted that if the UNSC fails to address the intelligence shared by Israel effectively, Israel would not hesitate to take decisive action In a stern warning to the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), Israel has highlighted Iran's increased shipments of weapons to Hezbollah through Syria, raising concerns over violations of international resolutions. Foreign Minister Israel Katz underscored in a letter to the UNSC that Iran's actions constitute "gross violations" of UNSC Resolution 1701, along with breaches of Resolutions 2231 and 1540. The communication emphasized Iran's intensified weapon transfers to Hezbollah amid the ongoing conflict in Gaza, using various channels including land, air, and sea routes, in clear defiance of international mandates. The shipments, detailed in the letter, encompass components crucial for air defense systems, drones such as the Shahed-101 and Shahed-136, and a range of missiles including the Mini-Ababil and the 358 anti-aircraft interceptor. Katz's letter also outlined the involvement of units from the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) and Hezbollah in facilitating these transfers, as well as instances where Israel has intercepted such deliveries. Responding to reports on the letter, Katz reiterated Israel's position, characterizing Iran as "the head of the snake." He emphasized Israel's dwindling patience for diplomatic solutions in the face of escalating threats from Iran and its proxies. Katz asserted that if the UNSC fails to address the intelligence shared by Israel effectively, Israel would not hesitate to take decisive action. The warning from Israel comes amid rising tensions in the region, with ongoing conflicts in Gaza and heightened concerns over Iran's influence and activities. Israel has long regarded Iran's support for Hezbollah as a significant security threat, and the recent surge in weapon shipments has only exacerbated these concerns. <- Previous Read full article Next -> More Insights 7 Ways Hamas Exploits Palestinian Civilians in Gaza Antisemitism defined: Why opposing the Jewish people's right to self-determination is antisemitic What You Need to Know About Israel’s Humanitarian Aid To Gaza Fatah responds to Hamas criticism of new formation of PA government ‘without consulting Hamas’ Surprise jump in Gazan support for 2-state solution, while still in favor of Oct 7 attack Hamas' Most Horrific Weapon of War: 5 Takeaways from UN Report on Sexual Violence Against Israelis Latest Video Clips The History of Israel This Muslim Israeli Woman Is the Future of the Middle East Natasha Hausdorff responds to the content of the House of Commons Gaza Debate. Its time to face the hard truth that you're being played as a sacrificial fool by terrorists. Peace cannot be achieved with those who desire war and jihad instead. 'Awful Things Happening In Israel Nothing To Do With British Jews'

Fighting Terror October 7th War in Gaza In a Nutshell The Israel-Hamas conflict is marked by Hamas's use of unconventional tactics like using civilians as human shields and operating from civilian areas, complicating Israel's military response. Israel's Defense Forces attempt to minimize civilian casualties through warnings and evacuation alerts, but these efforts are challenged by Hamas's strategies. Despite these difficulties, Israel continues to provide humanitarian aid to Gaza, even as Hamas diverts these resources. This situation underscores the complexities of fighting a terror organization that flouts international warfare norms. The full story References Related Videos Full Story The Full Story The Israel-Hamas conflict poses significant challenges due to Hamas's tactics, which deviate from conventional warfare rules. Hamas employs strategies such as using civilians as human shields, firing rockets from civilian areas like schools, mosques, and hospitals, and kidnapping individuals, including women, children, and the elderly, without providing access to the Red Cross or any information about their condition. These tactics complicate Israel's military response, as they blur the lines between combatants and non-combatants and exploit the civilian population for military gain. In response, Israel has taken measures to minimize civilian casualties. The Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) issue warnings to civilians before bombing houses, a practice known as "roof knocking," where a non-lethal bomb is used to alert residents of an impending strike. Additionally, the IDF drops leaflets and sends text messages and phone calls to civilians in areas designated for attack, urging them to evacuate. Despite these efforts, the challenge remains significant due to Hamas's deliberate placement of military targets within civilian areas and their encouragement of civilians to ignore IDF warnings, thereby increasing the risk of civilian casualties. Furthermore, Israel continues to provide humanitarian aid to Gaza, despite the challenges posed by Hamas, who often divert these resources from the civilians they are intended to help. This situation underscores the complexities Israel faces in conducting military operations against a terrorist organization that disregards international war rules and exploits civilian populations to shield its fighters and assets. References References Israel action - analyzed by international law expert Israel operates under international law Reletaed Videos Related Videos Hamas, the Palestinian Islamic Jihad, and their use of hospitals. The missile exploded on the hospital in Gaza was fired by Jihadi Islam. CRITICAL things to say to fellow journalists by Nadav Eyal Who is right in the Israel Hamas conflict Who bombed a hospital in Gaza? Don't Believe the News: Unveiling the Unfiltered Gaza Truth Load More

While Iran’s recent strikes show weakness, its threat of escalation is working 22 January 2024 By: The Times of Israel Iran recently increased its military attacks in response to threats on its soil. These attacks included strikes in Iraq, Syria, and against a Sunni terrorist group in Pakistan. Iran claimed to target a Mossad headquarters in Iraq and Islamic State positions in Syria, but there were civilian casualties, including a Kurdish businessman and his daughter. Iran's actions reflect a shift from using proxy groups to direct involvement. Previously, its proxies, like Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon, engaged in conflicts against Israel. The Houthis in Yemen also attacked ships, impacting global trade. The attacks indicate Iran's need to show strength against various threats, including ISIS, separatist groups, and Israel. However, these responses also highlight Iran's limitations. Despite claims of targeting Israeli and Sunni terrorist threats, Iran's strikes seem less effective, especially with Pakistan responding with strikes inside Iran. Iran's strategy aims to pressure the US to influence Israel's actions against Hamas. Iran hopes the US will seek to avoid a regional conflict, potentially leading to reduced support for Israel's actions against Hamas and Hezbollah. The recent events suggest that a regional coalition against Iran could be possible if the US government is determined. <- Previous Read full article Next -> More Insights 7 Ways Hamas Exploits Palestinian Civilians in Gaza Antisemitism defined: Why opposing the Jewish people's right to self-determination is antisemitic What You Need to Know About Israel’s Humanitarian Aid To Gaza Fatah responds to Hamas criticism of new formation of PA government ‘without consulting Hamas’ Surprise jump in Gazan support for 2-state solution, while still in favor of Oct 7 attack Hamas' Most Horrific Weapon of War: 5 Takeaways from UN Report on Sexual Violence Against Israelis Latest Video Clips The History of Israel This Muslim Israeli Woman Is the Future of the Middle East Natasha Hausdorff responds to the content of the House of Commons Gaza Debate. Its time to face the hard truth that you're being played as a sacrificial fool by terrorists. Peace cannot be achieved with those who desire war and jihad instead. 'Awful Things Happening In Israel Nothing To Do With British Jews'

Tikva International – Enlightening minds, nurturing peace Download YouTube 2023-12-09 (#196) < Previous Next > In a world where misinformation spreads faster than truth, Tikva International stands as a beacon of hope and clarity. Our mission is simple yet profound: to combat hate propaganda against Israelis and Jews, and to share unfiltered facts, fostering a brighter future for everyone in the Middle East. At Tikva International, we understand the power of knowledge in overcoming prejudice and ignorance. In an era dominated by fake news and populism, we strive to present the truth as we see it – unadulterated and unbiased. Our approach is grounded in careful selection of video resources from professional TV channels, social media influencers, and other credible content producers. We believe in educating for clarity, helping every open-minded individual to see beyond rumors and prejudice. Join us in this vital journey. Together, we can illuminate minds, bridge divides, and pave the way for a future where truth and understanding reign supreme. Visit: https://www.tikva.international to learn more and subscribe to our newsletter for early access to new content. Your support makes a world of difference. Video Transcription: In a world where misinformation spreads faster than truth, Tikva International stands as a beacon of hope and clarity. Our mission is simple yet profound: to combat hate propaganda against Israelis and Jews, and to share unfiltered facts, fostering a brighter future for everyone in the Middle East. At Tikva International, we understand the power of knowledge in overcoming prejudice and ignorance. In an era dominated by fake news and populism, we strive to present the truth as we see it – unadulterated and unbiased. Our approach is grounded in careful selection of video resources from professional TV channels, social media influencers, and other credible content producers. We believe in educating for clarity, helping every open-minded individual to see beyond rumors and prejudice. Join us in this vital journey. Together, we can illuminate minds, bridge divides, and pave the way for a future where truth and understanding reign supreme. Visit: https://www.tikva.international to learn more and subscribe to our newsletter for early access to new content. Your support makes a world of difference.

7 Ways Some Anti-Israel Protests Have Spread Antisemitism 23 October 2023 By: AJC When does criticizing Israel veer into antisemitic territory? In May 2021, as tensions heightened during the conflict between Israel and terrorist groups in Gaza, we saw two examples: beating Jews down in the streets and telling them to go back to Israel. Across the globe, protesters—some maliciously, some unwittingly—employed and spread antisemitic themes and tropes. Fast forward to October 7, 2023, as thousands of Hamas terrorists funded by Iran and fueled by hatred for Jews attacked Israel with one goal: to indiscriminately butcher and kidnap as many Israelis as possible—women, the elderly, children, and babies. The numbers now stand at 1,400 murdered and over 200 held hostage in Gaza, their fate unknown. As Israel rightfully responds to terrorism and defends its people, we must be prepared for rising antisemitism. We must anticipate false moral equivalencies. Double standards. Misinformation. Outright lies. We’re already seeing this from certain media outlets and prominent voices. There’s a source that offers clear guardrails about what can constitute antisemitism: the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s (IHRA) Working Definition of Antisemitism adopted by more than 1,000 entities, including more than 40 governments, the EU, the Organization of American States, recommended for use by the UN, used by the U.S. Departments of State and Education and embraced by the White House. The Working Definition is a clear and compact description of antisemitism in its various forms, including where and how anti-Israel animus can become a form of antisemitism, separate and apart from criticism of Israel. American Jewish Committee (AJC) created its signature tool: Translate Hate – a glossary of dozens of antisemitic terms – many dating back to medieval times, others either born or given new life in recent years – to shine a light on antisemitism that can hide in plain sight. Here are seven antisemitic terms, tropes, and themes that pervaded anti-Israel protests during the last significant conflict between Hamas and Israel in May 2021, and new examples already seen since Hamas prompted its brutal, unprovoked war on Israel in October 2023. To be clear, these trends make life more dangerous for Jews in America and around the world. Today, as this dangerous rhetoric ramps up and as Jewish communities across the globe increase security, we must be prepared to recognize and respond to antisemitism no matter the source. 1. Dirty/Filthy Jews and 2. Dual Loyalty What happened: In the wake of Hamas's war on Israel, antisemitic incidents have quadrupled in the United Kingdom, including a Jewish person walking to a synagogue in London on October 8, 2023, who was called a "dirty Jew" by a stranger, who said, "no wonder you're all getting raped." In New York’s Times Square in May 2021, a man wearing a yarmulke was punched, kicked, and attacked with pepper spray by several men who yelled a series of antisemitic phrases, including the well-worn antisemitic epithet “Dirty Jew. Filthy Jew,” as well as “Hamas is going to kill you” and “Go back to Israel.” Why this is antisemitic: Dirty/filthy Jews: These are slurs meant to demean Jewish people and cast them as unworthy, unclean, and greedy. Depending on the context, it can refer to multiple themes of antisemitism, including “Poisoning the well,” an accusation rooted in the 14th century Bubonic Plague, blaming Jews for purposefully spreading disease and “greed,” which has led to a long list of Jewish stereotypes, including being excessively materialistic and money-oriented, exploiting others for personal gain, being overly wealthy, and controlling the world’s finances. Dual loyalty: Telling an American Jew to “go back to Israel” is a form of dual loyalty, accusing a Jewish person of being a disloyal citizen whose true allegiance is to Israel. This charge sows distrust and spreads harmful ideas—like the belief that Jews are a traitorous “fifth column,” meaning they undermine their country from within. For centuries, these antisemitic accusations of disloyalty have led to the harassment, marginalization, oppression, and murder of Jewish people. Go deeper, read more from AJC Translate Hate’s entry on Dual Loyalty. Hamas, the terrorist group that occupies Gaza : The terrorist organization is dedicated to the murder of all Jews in Israel – a goal spelled out in its charter: the end to the Jewish state and the creation of an Islamic state from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea. "As stated in its founding document, the Hamas Charter, Hamas is committed to waging Jihad, or holy war, in order “to raise the banner of Allah over every inch of Palestine.” Its stated goal is to eliminate the Jewish state and kill Jews. That is precisely what it has set out to do, and has been doing, in its present savage campaign of mass slaughter. Any justification for Hamas - which we are already seeing offline and online in our research - must be condemned for what it is, a justification for the indiscriminate murder of Jews. We call on decent people everywhere, including on social media platforms, to help reduce the accelerating and dangerous hatred of Jews and Israel." 3. From the River to the Sea At a London rally organized by the Palestine Solidarity Campaign on October 9, 2023, demonstrators in front of the Israeli embassy chanted “From the River to the Sea” – a call for Palestinian control over the entirety of Israel’s borders, from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea. Why it is antisemitic: There is, of course, nothing antisemitic about advocating for Palestinians to have their own state. However, when protesters chant “From the River to the Sea,” they are rejecting Israel’s right to exist, by indicating that the entire land of Israel should be freed from Jews. Calling for the elimination of the Jewish state denies Jews the right to self-determination. This saying is a historic call-to-arms for terrorist groups and their sympathizers, from the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) to Hamas. In fact, Hamas leaders shared the belief that the Jewish people do not have the right to a national home in their ancestral homeland (e.g. that the State of Israel should not exist)—is itself widely believed by Jews to be a form of antisemitism. Go deeper, and read AJC Translate Hate’s entry on Zionist. Translate Hate Glossary: How to Spot Antisemitism 4. Deicide and 5. Blood Libel “Jesus was Palestinian, and you killed him too!” declared a protester’s sign in Miami. In Los Angeles, protesters hoisted a banner with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu wearing a Hitler mustache and devouring a Palestinian child. Both tropes voiced in 2021 echo centuries-old methods of maligning Jews. Why this is antisemitic: Deicide: While the deicide charge, or blaming Jews for Jesus’ death has been refuted by the Catholic Church, antisemites continue to make this charge to justify their anti-Jewish hatred. Branding Jews as Christ-killers has been recycled in the Middle East, often in the form of Jesus representing Palestinians who are “crucified” by the Israeli Defense Forces or the Israeli Government. Blood libel: Blood libel charges have evolved from Medieval times into widespread blame of Jews or Israelis for purposefully targeting and killing Palestinian children. As one of the longest-standing forms of antisemitism, blood libels have led to horrific violence, destruction, persecution, and massacres of Jewish people and communities—before, during, and beyond the Nazi propaganda that used it to demonize Jews. 6. Holocaust Denial/Distortion A day after the brutal Hamas invasion which left over 1,300 people dead, a crowd of pro-Palestinian protesters took over New York City’s Time Square on October 8, 2023, waving signs and placards including a Nazi swastika. Similarly, when a Jewish group gathered in Boca Raton, Florida to show their support for Israel in 2021, white supremacists cruised by in a van painted with the phrases “Holocaust never happened” and “Hitler was right” and waving a Palestinian flag. At the same time, at a Seattle rally, a sign featured images of Adolf Hitler and Netanyahu side-by-side with the slogan “Zionism=Nazism.” Why this is antisemitic: Holocaust denial: Those who say the Holocaust did not happen or deny its scope are peddling antisemitism. Despite endless historical facts, Holocaust denial spreads the false notion that Jews invented or exaggerated the Holocaust, including the diary of Anne Frank, Hitler’s intent to massacre Jews, the use of gas chambers in concentration camps, and the murder of six million Jews. Holocaust distortion: Equating the Israeli prime minister to Hitler is a graphic and offensive form of Holocaust distortion. One can disagree with Israeli policy, but saying Israel is perpetrating a “second Holocaust” and trying to annihilate Palestinians just as Hitler attempted to annihilate all of Europe’s Jews is not only factually wrong, it is antisemitic. Claiming that Israel, home to the largest number of living Holocaust survivors, behaves like the Nazis in its treatment of Palestinians is a personal attack on survivors and distorts the impact of the Shoah. 7. Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the State of Israel As hundreds of pro-Palestinian protesters gathered outside the Sydney Opera House on October 8, 2023, to oppose the building being lit in blue and white to demonstrate solidarity with Australian Jewish communities, shouts of “Gas the Jews” were heard. On October 8, 2023, the glass front door of a kosher restaurant in northwest London was smashed and its cash register stolen, while a bridge just meters away was spray-painted with ‘Free Palestine.’ Unfortunately, the restaurant burglary is not being treated as a hate crime despite its timing and proximity to the bridge graffiti. Additionally, Jewish students at the College of William & Mary say that other students verbally assaulted them due to Hamas's war on Israel. Three Salt Lake City synagogues were also forced to evacuate due to a bomb threat during pro-Palestinian rallies held following the outbreak of the war. In Tunisia, the Al Hammah synagogue was burned and destroyed in rioting tied to the Israel-Hamas war. Why this is antisemitic: Interchangeably targeting Jewish people for the actions and policies of a sovereign nation furthers conspiracy theories about control and world domination. Reports that claim Jews control the media, banks, and governments are part of a longstanding conspiracy of secret Jewish power. This antisemitic trope is rooted in the discredited publication, The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, which was published in Russian tsarist times and accused Jews of trying to control the world. <- Previous Read full article Next -> More Insights 7 Ways Hamas Exploits Palestinian Civilians in Gaza Antisemitism defined: Why opposing the Jewish people's right to self-determination is antisemitic What You Need to Know About Israel’s Humanitarian Aid To Gaza Fatah responds to Hamas criticism of new formation of PA government ‘without consulting Hamas’ Surprise jump in Gazan support for 2-state solution, while still in favor of Oct 7 attack Hamas' Most Horrific Weapon of War: 5 Takeaways from UN Report on Sexual Violence Against Israelis Latest Video Clips The History of Israel This Muslim Israeli Woman Is the Future of the Middle East Natasha Hausdorff responds to the content of the House of Commons Gaza Debate. Its time to face the hard truth that you're being played as a sacrificial fool by terrorists. Peace cannot be achieved with those who desire war and jihad instead. 'Awful Things Happening In Israel Nothing To Do With British Jews'

The West is Next October 7th Impact on the west The phrase "The West is next" reflects a heightened fear in Europe of Islamic terrorism, particularly following the October 7 Hamas attack. This concern is rooted in a history of deadly attacks by groups like ISIL and Al-Qaeda, as well as the actions of Islamist lone wolves. Recent years have seen a resurgence of terrorism threats in Europe, exacerbated by conflicts such as the Israel-Hamas war. Images and narratives from these conflicts are stirring radicals to action, sometimes leading to lethal attacks. European security agencies, including Europol, have identified Islamist terrorism as the most significant threat to Western Europe, with a focus on monitoring online content linked to Jihadist terrorists. The growing risk is primarily attributed to "lone wolf" assailants, who are influenced by extremist ideologies and are challenging to track. This situation has led to increased surveillance and security measures across Europe, as governments grapple with the complex task of preventing future attacks while addressing the underlying causes of radicalization. European governments are facing a complex dilemma in addressing Islamic terrorism, as they navigate the sensitive issue of being perceived as racist or discriminatory towards Muslims. This apprehension stems from a deep concern about exacerbating Islamophobia and being labeled as racist, which has led to a cautious approach in handling Islamic terror. The fear of offending Muslim communities and being accused of racism has resulted in some governments hesitating to directly confront the problem of Islamic terrorism. This reluctance is evident in the broader context of rising hate crimes against Muslims and Jews in Europe, where officials emphasize the protection of these communities while often avoiding direct references to Islamic extremism in their public discourse. The challenge lies in striking a balance between ensuring public safety and security from the threats of terrorism, and maintaining a respectful and non-discriminatory approach towards the Muslim population. This situation has led to criticism that some European governments are not fully addressing the severity of Islamic terror due to concerns over being perceived as targeting a specific religious group. References Related Videos References References European officials ‘deeply concerned’ for Muslims amid surge in attacks Interview: Antisemitism and Islamophobia Spike in Europe Council of Europe resolution is a call for action against Islamophobia in Europe Gaza war increases risk of Islamist attacks in Europe, security officials say Europol director says Islamist terrorism remains the biggest terror threat to Western Europe Reletaed Videos Related Videos The Last Line of Defense By Bari Weiss Would you feel differently if the events of October 7th were happening in London? Who is behind the Pro Palestinians protest in America? A Letter to America?! Lord David Wolfson speaking from the heart at the UK House of Lords Iranian people for the state of Israel Load More

5 Key Takeaways from AJC’s State of Antisemitism in America 2023 Report 28 February 2024 By: AJC For the past five years, AJC’s State of Antisemitism in America Report – the most comprehensive study of its kind – has measured the impact of antisemitism on Jewish Americans and, for the past four years, compared these findings with how the U.S. general public perceives the threat. Field work began on October 5, 2023. But on October 7, as Hamas terrorists murdered over 1,200 Jews and Israelis and kidnapped hundreds more, the ground suddenly shifted. AJC worked with the independent research firm SSRS to leave the field and add new questions to reflect the new reality facing American Jews. The revised survey fully launched on October 17 and generated some grim findings. Here are five key takeaways from AJC’s State of Antisemitism in America 2023 Report . 1. Hamas’ massacre of Israelis made most American Jews feel less safe. Of the 98% of American Jews who heard at least a little about the October 7 terrorist attack on Israel by Hamas, almost eight in ten said it made them feel less safe. “The attacks in Israel have left me feeling isolated and unsafe,” one 35-year-old man said. “Cheering our deaths and murders and justifying it as resistance is very, very upsetting.” More than six in ten American Jews (63%) said the status of Jews in the U.S. is “less secure than a year ago”– more than a 20 percentage-point increase in just one year and a 30 percentage-point increase in two years. The number one reason given for feeling this way is the Hamas-Israel war. Those feelings of unease are also reflected in the finding that in the past year, nearly half (46%) of American Jews have changed their behavior out of fear of antisemitism in at least one of the following ways: avoiding certain places or events, publicly wearing or displaying things, or posting social media content that might identify them as Jewish. Those who felt at least a little less safe after October 7 were far more likely to have altered their behavior. “It is sadly not surprising that the vast majority of American Jews are feeling less safe today than they did before October 7, 2023,” said AJC CEO Ted Deutch. “In the days, weeks, and months since the terror attack, the world has seen a staggering increase in antisemitic speech, anti-Jewish violence, and demonstrations glorifying Hamas terrorists. How are Jews supposed to feel secure when so many side with the murderers in the wake of the deadliest attack against the Jewish people since the Holocaust?” Most American Jews (93%) said antisemitism is a very or somewhat serious problem in the U.S., with more than half (53%) saying the problem is very serious. Almost nine in ten (86%) American Jews said antisemitism has increased in the past five years. Holly Huffnagle, AJC’s U.S. Director of Combating Antisemitism, said the rise in violence and growing acceptance of antisemitism were the main drivers of feeling less secure last year. This year, only 18% attributed that ebbing sense of security to a rise in antisemitic attacks and violence; 17% cited a growing acceptance of antisemitism and racism. Antisemitism Behind the Numbers: Four Stories About What It's Like to Be Jewish in America in 2023 “While we know this survey captured a moment in time and context is critical, we can say the Hamas attacks overshadowed those reasons for concern this year,” Huffnagle said. “October 7th is not another incident in the Middle East conflict. The very protection from antisemitism that Israel’s establishment after the Holocaust promised, was shattered on 10/7 by terrorists who have the same genocidal desires as Nazi Germany. When American Jews see their fellow Americans going to pro-Hamas rallies, sharing Hamas propaganda on social media, or justifying Hamas actions, it’s understandable they’re going to report feeling less safe.” 2. For most American Jews, Israel is important to their Jewish identity. The emotional toll of the Hamas attacks might have something to do with the significance and symbolism of the Jewish homeland for Jews. For the first time, the 2023 survey asked a question about how important caring about Israel is to respondents’ Jewish identity. Eight in ten American Jews said caring about Israel is important to what being Jewish means to them. About two-thirds (67%) of those who say caring about Israel is important to what being Jewish means to them say the status of Jews in the U.S. is less secure than a year ago. “While I do not currently have any family in Israel, I have close friends who either live there or have children living there,” a 76-year-old woman said in response to the survey. “This recent terrorist attack by Hamas has shaken us to the core.” The fact that hostility toward Israel and hatred of Jews can be closely intertwined was on full display in the aftermath of October 7th. Importantly, there is widespread recognition among American Jews–and among the general public – about anti-Israel antisemitism. 85% of American Jews and 84% of the general public believe the statement “Israel has no right to exist”–the foundational core of anti-Zionism– is antisemitic . Among those who say caring about Israel is at least somewhat important to their Jewish identity, that figure goes up to 93%. 3 . Rising antisemitism is changing everyday life for American Jews in the workplace, online, and especially on college campuses Fifteen percent of fully or partially employed Jewish adults said they have avoided wearing or displaying something in their workplace or around colleagues that would identify them as Jewish. Thirteen percent have felt uncomfortable or unsafe, at least once, in their workplace because of their Jewish identity. (Those who are self-employed were not included in these findings.) In addition, one in five (19%) American Jews reported local businesses where they live have been the target of antisemitism in the past five years. Orthodox Jews are more likely than members of other denominations to say a local business where they live has been the target of antisemitism in the past five years at least once: 33% of Orthodox Jews say this, compared with 21% of Reform Jews, 18% of Conservative Jews, and 17% of secular Jews. Current or recent Jewish college students and their parents also reported confronting antisemitism on campuses over the last 12 months. That was especially on display after October 7, when some Jewish students faced antisemitic slogans at anti-Israel rallies and physical threats. In fact, one in four (26%) American Jews with a current or recent connection to a college campus (as a parent or student) said they avoided expressing their views on Israel because of fears of antisemitism. And one in five (20%) reported feeling or being excluded from a group or event because they are Jewish. One in four (24%) said they felt uncomfortable or unsafe at a campus event because they are Jewish. “AJC’s work in school and university spaces has illuminated for us how much the current wave of antisemitism is disproportionately attacking young people,” said Dr. Laura Shaw Frank, AJC’s Director of Contemporary Jewish Life. “Problematic discourse on Israel, which often crosses the line into antisemitism, has made educational spaces very challenging for young American Jews. Many Jewish university students have shared with us that they do not feel that their school administrations are effectively protecting Jewish students.” Notably, young American Jews are more likely than their older counterparts to be a target of antisemitism. 36% of young American Jews were the personal target of antisemitism in the last 12 months compared to 22% over age 30. Online and on social media continues to be the place where American Jews experience antisemitism the most. 62% reported seeing or hearing antisemitism online or on social media in the past 12 months. For 22% of them, those incidents made them feel physically threatened. This is perhaps why 30% of American Jews reported in the last 12 months that they have avoided posting content online that would identify them as Jewish or reveal their views on Jewish issues. In addition, 72% of American Jews are concerned (very or somewhat) that generative artificial intelligence (AI) or automated systems, such as ChatGPT, will spread misinformation about Jews. 62% of American Jews expressed concern that generative AI will show bias against Israel. 4. More U.S. adults are waking up to the reality of antisemitism in America. Americans are noticing antisemitism. A growing percentage of the general population is finally seeing the problem. Almost three-quarters (74%) said antisemitism is a very or somewhat serious problem in the U.S. today. In fact, in just one year, there has been a 12 percentage point increase in U.S. adults who say antisemitism is a “very serious” problem: 34% in 2023 versus 22% in 2022. Likewise, there has been a noticeable increase among the share of U.S. adults who say antisemitism has increased over the past five years; more than half of American adults now express this sentiment: 56% in 2023 versus 47% in 2022. Almost four in ten U.S. adults said they personally witnessed antisemitism in the past twelve months. One in three Americans (not just those who witnessed incidents) reported having spoken out against antisemitism in the past. “In the last few years, unfortunately, because antisemitic incidents have become more open and violent, emanated from more sources, and have even been shared across the internet by celebrities, like Kanye West, the American population is beginning to have the awareness that the Jewish community has had for some time,” Huffnagle said. “We now have new opportunities to work with the general public in a way we did not a few years ago when they didn’t recognize the problem.” 5. The data reveals a path forward. More Americans not only recognize that there is a problem, but they also want to know more and do more. An overwhelming majority of Americans believe more resources should be invested in teaching the Holocaust in public schools (91% for American Jews and 85% for U.S. adults). They also believe state and local governments should include contemporary antisemitism in public school curricula (86% for American Jews and 75% for U.S. adults). Furthermore, 77% of American Jews and 72% of U.S. adults said public schools should include Jewish studies within ethnic studies or history curricula. In addition, the vast majority (93% of American Jews and 91% of U.S. adults) believe it is important that law enforcement be required to report hate crimes to a federal government database. Nine in ten Americans, both Jews and U.S. adults, say it’s important for the Jewish community and other religious and ethnic communities to increase cooperation with each other. Perhaps most noteworthy, nine in ten Americans, both Jews and U.S. adults, say antisemitism affects society as a whole, and everyone is responsible for combating it. Fortunately, this past year, the U.S. followed in Europe’s footsteps and unveiled a strategy for Americans to do that. But the survey found that more than half of Americans (56% for both U.S. adults and American Jews) had never heard of the U.S. Strategy to Counter Antisemitism released by the Biden administration last May. There is still so much for America to learn. <- Previous Read full article Next -> More Insights 7 Ways Hamas Exploits Palestinian Civilians in Gaza Antisemitism defined: Why opposing the Jewish people's right to self-determination is antisemitic What You Need to Know About Israel’s Humanitarian Aid To Gaza Fatah responds to Hamas criticism of new formation of PA government ‘without consulting Hamas’ Surprise jump in Gazan support for 2-state solution, while still in favor of Oct 7 attack Hamas' Most Horrific Weapon of War: 5 Takeaways from UN Report on Sexual Violence Against Israelis Latest Video Clips The History of Israel This Muslim Israeli Woman Is the Future of the Middle East Natasha Hausdorff responds to the content of the House of Commons Gaza Debate. Its time to face the hard truth that you're being played as a sacrificial fool by terrorists. Peace cannot be achieved with those who desire war and jihad instead. 'Awful Things Happening In Israel Nothing To Do With British Jews'

Impact on Israel October 7th In a Nutshell The October 7 Hamas attack on Israel, with approximately 1,200 Israeli fatalities, is the third-deadliest terrorist attack since 1970 and the deadliest against Israel since its establishment in 1948. This attack had a significant per capita impact, being the deadliest per capita terrorist attack since 1970. It led to strong political support in Israel for continued military operations in Gaza. The hostage crisis following the attack added complexity, involving mass hostage-taking and negotiations during Israel's military operation. This attack marked an evolution in Hamas's tactics, showcasing sophisticated methods and the ability to breach Israeli defenses. The incident sparked global protests, influencing public opinion and potentially affecting government policies in countries with influence over the conflict. In Israel, the attack impacted the political landscape, diminishing Prime Minister Netanyahu's popularity and revealing government unpreparedness. This compounded existing tensions due to proposed judicial reforms, leading to Israel's largest street protests. These protests united diverse groups against perceived threats to democratic principles, reflecting Israel's long-term demographic shifts and socio-political dynamics. The crisis intertwines domestic politics and security issues, with the government facing formidable opposition despite maintaining enough support to pursue its agenda. The ongoing conflict with Hamas and international perspectives on the Israeli-Palestinian issue add to the complexity, suggesting a protracted path towards resolution. The full story References Related Videos Full Story The Full Story Historical Context: The October 7 Hamas attack on Israel is considered the third-deadliest terrorist attack since 1970 based on fatalities. It is the deadliest attack against Israel since its establishment in 1948, with a death toll unprecedented in Israeli history. Casualties and Response: The attack resulted in approximately 1,200 Israeli fatalities, significantly higher than any previous attacks in Israel's history. This high number of casualties led to a strong political support in Israel for continued military operations in Gaza, despite potential civilian casualties. Per Capita Impact: The attack is the deadliest per capita terrorist attack since 1970, with a rate of over one person killed per every 10,000 Israelis, highlighting the profound national impact and sense of loss in Israel. Hostage Situation: The hostage crisis in Gaza following the attack is complex, involving mass hostage-taking and negotiations during a major military operation. Israel has been balancing negotiations for hostage releases with its ground offensive in Gaza. Hamas’s Tactics: The attack marked an evolution in Hamas's capabilities, employing sophisticated tactics and demonstrating an ability to breach Israeli defenses. Over 1,000 Hamas fighters entered southern Israel, using drones, explosives, and bulldozers to overcome the border defenses. Global Protests: The conflict sparked global protests, with varying reactions worldwide. While these demonstrations are unlikely to directly influence Israeli government decisions, they may affect public opinion and government policies in countries with influence over the conflict. Political Impact: The Israeli government's crises, encompassing legal reforms, civil protests, and the impact of the October 7th Hamas attack, present a multifaceted challenge intertwining domestic politics and security issues. The Hamas attack notably diminished Prime Minister Netanyahu's popularity, revealing the government's unpreparedness and exacerbating existing tensions. These tensions were already heightened by proposed judicial reforms, which have triggered Israel's largest street protests, uniting diverse groups against perceived threats to democratic principles. This political turmoil is deeply rooted in Israel's long-term demographic shifts and socio-political dynamics, including the rise of ideologically driven minority groups and a general rightward political shift. The controversy over judicial reforms, combined with Netanyahu's legal troubles and the nature of his right-wing government, has deepened public distrust. Protestors fear that diminishing the Supreme Court's power could lead to increased religious influence in state affairs, discrimination against Arab citizens, and intensified West Bank settlements. The resolution of this crisis remains uncertain. The government maintains enough support to pursue its agenda but faces formidable opposition. The ongoing conflict with Hamas and international perspectives on the Israeli-Palestinian issue further complicate the situation. Despite a challenging outlook, potential shifts in political alignments and international influence could foster positive change. However, the crisis's deep-seated and systemic nature suggests a complex and protracted path towards resolution. References References What October 7th Did and Didn’t Change About Israeli Politics The political crisis in Israel: the end of the beginning Hamas’s October 7 Attack: Visualizing the Data Many Israelis are furious at their government’s chaotic recovery efforts after Hamas attack Public trust in government scrapes bottom amid criticism for inadequate war response Reletaed Videos Related Videos Their last words in the midst of a terror attack 240 Rays of hope were sent from the heart of Jerusalem into the sky, The full story of Israel from past to present. Birthday video for their friend held captive in Gaza by terrorists. The abuse in the Hamas Terror Dungeons Imagine the horror of the hostages Load More