Search Results

‘It’s a lie’: Megyn Kelly slams the hostage release deal between Hamas and Israel Download YouTube 2023-11-29 (#167) < Previous Next > The Megyn Kelly Show host Megyn Kelly has slammed the details surrounding the hostage release deal between Israel and Hamas. “Each side has some children and some young people from the other side and now they’ve reached this even-steven deal to exchange them – it’s a lie,” Ms Kelly told Sky News Australia host Paul Murray. “Israel’s hostages were taken out of their beds in the middle of the night. “They’re civilians sleeping in the homes of their parents doing no harm to anyone … the people who just got released in the 50-person release are … not anything other than innocent civilians. “The people who are getting released, three to one by the way because that’s the deal Israel always has to strike in order to get any of its hostages back with the Palestinians, are people who were arrested with good cause for having broken laws in Israel." Video Transcription: Oh, it's truly like only Israel keeps children as prisoners. This is some of the reporting that we're seeing and repeating of reporting by people like Gigi Hadid out there talking about how, you know, it's the same thing. Each side has some children and some young people from the other side, and now they've reached this even Steven deal to exchange them. It's a lie. It's a lie. Israel's hostages were taken out of beds in the middle of the night. They're civilians sleeping in the homes of their parents, doing no harm to anyone. That's who they pulled. The people who just got released in the 50 person release are 85 year olds, 84 year olds, two year olds, three year olds, four year olds, eight year olds. These are not anything other than innocent civilians. The people who are getting released three to one by the way, because that's the deal that Israel always has to strike in order to get any of its hostages back with the Palestinians, are people who were arrested with good cause for having broken laws in Israel. They were afforded a due process. They either had trials or were about to go through trials for doing things like attempted murder. That's why they were in the Israeli jails. So you can dismiss them as children all you want, but what we really see is the poor 13-year-old and 15-year-old that were in the Israeli jail. They're there because they committed attempted murder by trying to stab innocent. And guess what? It's all on camera. Just to take one case. None of that is reflected in the headlines or the press reporting that we're seeing from places like the BBC and the NPR here in America. Never mind the worst offender, Al Jazeera, as they cover, know, totally benign, like prisoner swap, as if the two-year-old had been out there committing war crimes, and that's why Hamas took him. it's been very selective. The people who get released, most look pretty healthy, but we know that there are plenty of people who were deeply injured, physically injured when they were being taken, yet there's no proof of either if they're alive or what condition they're in. Instead, we're making it to seem like the people that Hamas is releasing are people who just know. An uncomfortable couple of weeks, but nothing bad here. Yeah, I know. I'm not surprised, of course, because they don't want international inspectors to come on site and see what they're doing. They would love to have international inspectors come on site and see some of their propaganda. They're releasing video around these hostages that is full of propaganda. And the first tape had them saying to the hostages, Wave. Go ahead and wave. Wave at the camera. So you see the hostages do that the next tape. They were smart enough to block out the sound. So you see the wave without the instructions going down. And of course, most of these people who are prisoners have been told that the rest of the prisoners will pay for it in blood and pain if they say anything too derogatory about Hamas. So they all have to be very careful upon release so as not to hurt anybody who's still there.

Toronto Jews anxious amid unprecedented antisemitic spillover from Gaza war 21 January 2024 By: The Times of Israel Toronto's Jewish community of 200,000 is experiencing heightened antisemitism since the Gaza war, with little support from Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's government. A bridge in Armour Heights, a Jewish neighborhood, has become a hotspot for anti-Israel protests, leading to police intervention. The protestors have displayed swastikas, photos of Hitler, and other antisemitic content, causing distress among residents. Police Chief Myron Demkiw has increased efforts to ensure safety, recognizing the 168% rise in antisemitic incidents in Toronto. The Jewish community feels isolated and concerned for their safety, facing vandalism, boycotts, and assaults. Trudeau's government has faced criticism for its response to the situation and perceived lack of support for the Jewish community. Despite the challenges, the Jewish community in Toronto remains resolute and engaged in supporting Israel and combating antisemitism. <- Previous Read full article Next -> More Insights 7 Ways Hamas Exploits Palestinian Civilians in Gaza Antisemitism defined: Why opposing the Jewish people's right to self-determination is antisemitic What You Need to Know About Israel’s Humanitarian Aid To Gaza Fatah responds to Hamas criticism of new formation of PA government ‘without consulting Hamas’ Surprise jump in Gazan support for 2-state solution, while still in favor of Oct 7 attack Hamas' Most Horrific Weapon of War: 5 Takeaways from UN Report on Sexual Violence Against Israelis Latest Video Clips The History of Israel This Muslim Israeli Woman Is the Future of the Middle East Natasha Hausdorff responds to the content of the House of Commons Gaza Debate. Its time to face the hard truth that you're being played as a sacrificial fool by terrorists. Peace cannot be achieved with those who desire war and jihad instead. 'Awful Things Happening In Israel Nothing To Do With British Jews'

TIKVA INTERNATIONAL We fight hate propaganda against Israelis and Jews, share facts, and promote a better future for all in the Middle East. Israelis & Palestinians alike In an era increasingly clouded by fake news and ignorance, Tikva International stands committed to dispelling misinformation and fostering a deeper understanding of the intricate Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Our mission is to enlighten and clarify, urging open-minded individuals to see beyond the simplicity of rumors and prejudice, and to appreciate the nuanced nature of this enduring conflict. Central to our educational approach is a focus on the pivotal events of October 7th and their extensive implications. We offer a distinctive, interactive mind map tool, designed to guide users through the complexities of the conflict in an associative and engaging manner. This innovative approach allows for a more comprehensive and insightful understanding of the multifaceted dynamics at play in the Israeli-Palestinian context. Contact us at: tikvaint@gmail.com Join our newsletter • Never Miss Out: Get Early Access to New Content – Subscribe Now! Join Thanks for subscribing!

Arab world calls stampede at aid truck 'deadly massacre' and U.S. is 'concerned' 29 February 2024 By: YNET Gazans swarming on aid trucks in Gaza(Photo: REUTERS/Kosay Al Nemer) Palestinian Authority and other Arab nations quick to accuse Israel of killing innocent Palestinians despite IDF probe showing the more than 100 Gazans were killed as they rushed to grab aid; US calls stampede 'serious incident' The Arab world rushed to blame Israel for "committing a heinous and brutal massacre" on Thursday after dozens of Gazans died during a stampede as large crowds descended on humanitarian aid trucks entering northern Gaza. This comes despite aerial documentation published by the IDF which clearly shows how the crowd attacked the trucks that arrived at the scene. The U.S. said officials were examining reports of the IDF opening fire on Gazans waiting for humanitarian aid and said it was a serious incident. "We mourn the loss of innocent life and recognize the dire humanitarian situation in Gaza, where innocent Palestinians are just trying to feed their families,” the White House National Security Council said in a statement. “This underscores the importance of expanding and sustaining the flow of humanitarian assistance into Gaza, including through a potential temporary cease-fire,” the statement added. The first to condemn the incident were Egypt and Jordan, who have signed peace agreements with Israel. Cairo issued a sharp condemnation of the incident and called it "an inhumane Israeli attack on Palestinian civilians waiting for the arrival of humanitarian aid trucks." According to Egypt: "This is a violation of international law and a disregard for human life. Egypt calls on international actors to halt the fighting, take humanitarian, moral and legal responsibility, and stop the Israeli war against Gaza." The Jordanian Foreign Ministry addressed the assailants who, according to the IDF’s investigation, opened fire at the aid and called them "Palestinians waiting to receive aid." "We condemn the cruel Israeli attack on Palestinians who were waiting to receive humanitarian aid from south of Gaza City," the ministry said in a statement. The Saudi Foreign Ministry said that Saudi Arabia condemns "the harm to civilians in the northern Gaza Strip, which led to dozens of dead and hundreds of injured." According to Riyadh, the international community "must take a firm stand and force Israel to respect international law, open humanitarian crossings, allow the evacuation of the wounded, and unlimited aid, in order to alleviate the humanitarian crisis and prevent it from getting worse." An initial IDF probe into the incident found that Palestinian gunmen fired at the aid trucks, with most fatalities resulting from trampling and crowding. Additionally, a portion of the crowd reportedly approached an IDF unit overseeing the trucks' entry, leading to soldiers firing warning shots into the air. The military’s investigation didn’t satisfy Palestinian Authority officials, after PA President Mahmoud Abbas called on Hamas to expedite talks for a hostage release deal with Israel in order to allow a cease-fire in Gaza as soon as possible. In light of Hamas' threats to halt the talks following the so-called "massacre," Abbas' office said: "The Palestinian presidency condemns the heinous massacre carried out by the Israeli occupation army against civilians awaiting the arrival of aid trucks, which led to their deaths and the injuries of hundreds." According to the statement, "the large number of innocent civilian casualties is an inseparable part of the genocide committed by the occupation’s government against us, and it bears full responsibility before international courts." The statement added that “this crime adds to a series of massacres committed by the occupation against our people since the beginning of the war, which left thousands dead and wounded, most of them children and women,” and stressed that international neglect of the issue “encourage the occupation to continue shedding Palestinian blood with unprecedented genocidal crimes in modern history." Abbas' office called on the U.S. to intervene and criticized the international community. "There’s an urgent need for international intervention in order to stop this war, especially by the American government which provides support and protection to the occupation," the statement read. Abbas’ office threw further accusations against Israel according to which, "these massacres clearly indicate that their true purpose is to slaughter the Palestinian people." These claims come after Gaza's Health Ministry, which is controlled by Hamas, reported that the number of victims has reached 104 dead, and about 700 wounded. According to eyewitnesses who spoke to CNN, the truck drivers tried to flee the area and accidentally ran over Palestinians who were there. The IDF's initial investigation also indicates that most of the victims died as a result of being crushed or trampled. Hamas warned in a statement that the incident could lead to the failure of talks aimed at a deal on a truce and hostage release. <- Previous Read full article Next -> More Insights 7 Ways Hamas Exploits Palestinian Civilians in Gaza Antisemitism defined: Why opposing the Jewish people's right to self-determination is antisemitic What You Need to Know About Israel’s Humanitarian Aid To Gaza Fatah responds to Hamas criticism of new formation of PA government ‘without consulting Hamas’ Surprise jump in Gazan support for 2-state solution, while still in favor of Oct 7 attack Hamas' Most Horrific Weapon of War: 5 Takeaways from UN Report on Sexual Violence Against Israelis Latest Video Clips The History of Israel This Muslim Israeli Woman Is the Future of the Middle East Natasha Hausdorff responds to the content of the House of Commons Gaza Debate. Its time to face the hard truth that you're being played as a sacrificial fool by terrorists. Peace cannot be achieved with those who desire war and jihad instead. 'Awful Things Happening In Israel Nothing To Do With British Jews'

Tuition of Terror? How Much Does Qatar’s Money Affect American Academia? 13 March 2024 By: Mid East Journal Is Qatari terror money funding US universities? In 2020, an investigation by the US Department of Education revealed billions of dollars in unreported foreign gifts to American institutions of higher education from foreign countries. Most of the donations found came from Qatar, which donated $4.7 billion to American universities between 2001-2021. As processes for reporting improve and more funding is revealed, the universities failing to reveal funding are under scrutiny, with many political and educational leaders predicting an erosion of democratic norms on campuses. Independent since 1971, Qatar lies between regional powers Saudi Arabia and Iran. Before the discovery of oil, its economy depended on fishing and pearl diving. Now, with a GNP of $229 billion, it is one of the world’s wealthiest countries and one of the most significant donors to institutions of higher education in America. At the height of globalization, foreign funding and partnerships with nations like Qatar could be an encouraging move for American institutes of higher education. But in recent years, studies have revealed just how deep Qatari funds are flowing into the coffers of American academia—with the majority of it going unreported for decades. With billions of dollars in hidden funds coming from a country with historically anti-American values, there is a big concern for what lies beneath this financial network of donors and recipients. It poses a risk to campus ecosystems regarding conflicts of interest and academic freedom and transparency. Many critics argue that foreign donations could exert undue influence on academic institutions, compromising their autonomy and integrity. A History of Unreported Funding from Qatar In 2012, a project titled Follow the Money headed by ISGAP (The Institute for Global Antisemitism & Policy) Director Charles Asher Small examined illicit funding flowing from foreign governments, foundations, and corporations into US universities. The findings were presented to Congress in July 2019, when the existence of sizable funding from foreign sources (many of whom adhere to anti-democratic and anti-Semitic ideologies) were revealed for the first time. It was a shocking lesson for the US Department of Education (DoE) to learn the details of billions of dollars in funding from foreign sources—primarily from Qatar—which had never appeared in the DoE’s reports. Discovering the billions of dollars in unreported funds to institutions of higher education did more than just raise eyebrows. It led to the launch of a federal government investigation in 2019. According to the Institutional Compliance Act in Section 117 of the Higher Education Act, universities that receive federal financial assistance are required to disclose any gifts received from foreign sources which, alone or combined, are valued at $250,000 within a single calendar year. This law aims to increase transparency around foreign money entering into US higher education. Clearly, it was being ignored. Secretary of Education DeVos initiated 12 civil investigations to ensure institutional compliance with Section 117. The investigation included the following schools: Georgetown University, Texas A&M University, Rutgers University, Cornell University, University of Maryland, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Harvard University, Yale University, University of Texas, Case Western Reserve University, Fordham University, and Stanford University. Since 2019, these investigations have pressured institutions to “catch up” on their reporting . The DoE established an online portal in June 2020 to streamline the process, and in just four months more than 7,000 transactions were recorded totaling roughly $3.8 billion—the largest donations coming from Qatar, China, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates. Close to 60 of the colleges and universities that filed through the portal had never submitted reports between the years 1986 and June 2020. A summary of the DoE’s findings published in October 2020 disclosed previously unreported funding to universities, amounting to $6.5 billion in foreign gifts and contracts. The more unreported funding that is uncovered, the more educational and political leaders realize there is a growing problem. Even as university presidents collect billions of dollars for their campuses, they don’t know enough about the depth of their donations from foreign funders. During the House of Representatives Education Committee’s hearing with presidents of UPenn, MIT, and Harvard, Representative Elise Stefanik started a line of questioning that shed light on this. Although each president claimed philanthropy from Qatar does not create conflicts of interest nor influence the way they run universities, they were also unaware of how much money they received from the country. Why (And How) Do Funds From Qatar Go Unnoticed? Although it has been the law since 1965, before the DoE’s investigation in 2019, it was previously lax in holding schools accountable for reporting. The “Follow the Money” report helped shed light on how a failure to pressure administrators to submit this information in the past led to major a lack of adherence to the law. It shed light on the need for the DoE to reinforce these obligations as a condition for accepting foreign money as well as creating guidelines for more conscientious reporting. Countries like Qatar are also able to cover up their influence by using third parties to deliver funds to schools in the US. Before 2020, the DoE only required universities to list the country where the donations come from, without specifying whether it was a government source or a private funder. When collaborating on projects, for example, professors are often paid salaries for joint initiatives from a US university that received direct funding from Qatar. Foreign companies are also utilized to transfer money from Qatar to various universities. How Much Does Qatar Donate to Universities In America? It is just emerging how deep-seated this network of undisclosed money is. However, Qatar has embedded itself in several top universities in the United States. In 2020, it was revealed that at least 100 American colleges and universities received approximately $13 billion in undocumented contributions from foreign governments, many of which are authoritarian countries. As the DoE improves its documentation process , the numbers keep growing. In April 2023, it was reported that American universities and colleges have received $19 billion from foreign sources that were not documented and undated, with total donations amounting to approximately $47 billion. The latest DoE report , published on October 13, 2023, revealed the most up-to-date updated total amount is $22 billion, with total donations reaching $51 billion. Top donors from this list include Arab countries including Qatar, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Kuwait, and Egypt. Just how much of this comes from Qatar? Between 2001 and 2021, the Qataris donated at least $4.7 billion to universities in the United States. The top 10 universities that benefited from Qatar’s money included: Carnegie Mellon University: $1.4 billion Cornell University: $1.2 billion Harvard University: $894 million MIT: $859 million Texas A&M: Just over $500 million Yale University: $495.8 million Northwestern University: $402 million Johns Hopkins University: $402 million Georgetown University: $401 million University of Chicago: $364 million According to the 2023 report by DoE, Qatar continues to provide one of the largest sources of funding, donating almost $5 billion to US campuses. It is followed by Saudi Arabia, which has donated approximately $3 billion, and the UAE and China which have each donated over $1 billion. The top recipients of Qatari funds have something in common: they all have flagship locations in Qatar’s “Education City,” receiving funding in return for their collaborations, including: Carnegie Mellon: Received $740 million in funding to establish a computer science and technology branch in 2004. Virginia Commonwealth: Received $103.5 million in funding to establish a Fine Arts branch in 1997. Texas A&M: Received $696 million in funding to establish an engineering branch in 2003. Cornell University: Received $1.7 billion in funding from Qatar to establish a Medical branch in 2001. Northwestern University: Received $601 million in funding to establish a Journalism branch in 2008. Georgetown University : Received $760.5 million in funding to establish a Political Science branch in Qatar in 2005. How Does Qatar’s Funding Influence Universities And Students? Does all of this funding represent a tuition of terror ? In an age of globalization, it seems on the surface like a virtue to collaborate openly with international universities that value the American education system. However, many professionals believe schools that promote open societies still need to approach financial ties to authoritarian states with caution, since it is not unfathomable that they leverage this donated money for influence. It is no secret the Qatari government’s values, for example, differ considerably from America’s. Although the Qataris have a vision of modernization, the quasi-absolute monarchy has illiberal practices and its laws do little to protect workers’ rights, women’s rights , or freedom of the press. Qatar’s financial networks have a reputation for breaking banking laws and are also known to support terrorist organizations, and funding groups like Hamas. Soft Power Versus Hard Power: The Impact of Qatari Donations on American University Culture The financial ties between foreign countries and American academia can take a variety of forms, including research collaborations, consulting relationships, the development of satellite institutions, or the sponsorships of student scholarships and initiatives on campus. While some claim Qatar is developing its ties with the American system of higher education to promote soft power, i.e., improving its relationship with Western powers, advancing its role in the Middle East, and influencing its own citizens—others believe the country’s financial and political networks expect their payments to US universities to leverage direct outcomes. According to a study conducted by the Institute for the Study of Global Antisemitism and Policy in 2023, there is a direct correlation between the institutions receiving undocumented contributions and: Increased political campaigns silencing academics. Increased speech intolerance: the termination of speakers and scholars, as well as investigation, censorship, demotion, or suspension of these speakers. More organized efforts or campaigns aimed at imposing sanctions on academic researchers. These outcomes illuminate how foreign government agendas infuse American educational programming both at home and abroad. This includes the scrutinizing or cancellation of activities , control of intellectual property and research, removing researchers from positions, or suspension and termination. There have also been instances where foreign donors’ stipulations reflect a considerable bias being into the classroom via curricula. Instances when course agendas and content are manipulated to shape classroom learning and discussions are not uncommon, especially regarding Middle Eastern studies. Previous Incidents of Terror States Funding American Universities In the years following 9/11, US schools began receiving substantially increased funding from Middle Eastern countries, amounting to billions of dollars. Today, Saudi Arabia and Qatar have become the largest donors to US institutions of higher education. In 2018, money flowing from Saudi sources started to attract attention and concern. The newfound scrutiny came after the killing of Washington Post journalist and Saudi dissident Jamal Khashoggi , when critics insisted that colleges needed to investigate the flow of funds coming from regimes with poor human rights records. At the time, students in colleges including MIT asked their president to cut ties with such donors. Citing a photo of the school’s president shaking hands with Mohammad bin Salman (known as MBS), the powerful Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia, the students noted that such relationships could also harm the school’s reputation and “provide the MBS regime with a veil of normalcy.” The Antisemitic Climate on College Campuses And Funding From Qatar When some of the most prestigious US universities are receiving large and sustained funding from the same entities providing large and sustained funding to Hamas’s terror-inciting leadership, it is not surprising to see a simultaneous rise of antisemitism on college campuses. A report by Network Contagion Research Institute revealed that from 2015-2020, institutions that accepted money from Arab donors in the Middle East had 300% more antisemitic incidents than institutions that did not. More specifically, campuses with undisclosed funds from Qatari donors had, on average, 250% more antisemitic incidents than those that did not receive such funding. Over the years it has also been revealed that there’s a direct connection between donations from Qatar and the presence of pro-Palestinian groups, such as Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP), on campuses. Disturbing Campus Responses Following October 7th Attacks Most recently, responses from universities following the October 7th terrorist attack in Israel reflect a disturbing rise in anti-Semitism . Heated anti-Israel protests since October 7th have led to increasing antisemitic rhetoric , visible support for terrorism , and violent encounters. Many student groups seemed somehow prepared for this in advance, with organizations such as SJP organizing protests and spreading anti-Zionist material as early as October 8, well before the Israeli Defense Forces activated its ground operation in Gaza. Jewish students have spoken out about their fears and need for safety, calling out university leaders for their complacency in the face of campus antisemitism and in some cases suing universities for tolerating and even promulgating Jewish hate . Many have documented that growing antisemitic instances have been ignored, or worse, defended by university staff— within the “context” of “freedom of speech.” Steps to Increase Donation Transparency The obscurity of the transfer of funds that increased dramatically since 9/11 is clearly a cause for concern. By failing to report these third-party transfers, Qatar can avoid scrutiny over its academic influence. Universities that have failed to reveal the origin of donations from Qatar will attract ongoing skepticism, suggesting university officials deliberately ignore regulators so that they do not obtain insight into the ongoing academic investments and potentially unctuous donor behavior. Especially since so many of these donations have gone unreported, critics say there needs to be more scrutiny regarding the influence gained by these billions of dollars. Without more information, analysts cannot measure the effects of the donations – or even know if funding contracts have been completed, allowing the DoE to conduct compliance investigations. Moving forward, experts have suggested that the US government should enact reforms to make more transparent the influence stemming from foreign donations. They advocate that this should be done by: Adding a provision to Section 117 mandating the disclosure of grantees who have connections to Qatar and other countries found to have funded organizations deemed by the US government to be terrorist organizations Establishing conflict-of-interest review boards at universities to regulate foreign funding sources and block those that threaten to compromise academic integrity or national security Enacting further transparency by requiring full public disclosure of all foreign contracts or donations received by American universities. <- Previous Read full article Next -> More Insights 7 Ways Hamas Exploits Palestinian Civilians in Gaza Antisemitism defined: Why opposing the Jewish people's right to self-determination is antisemitic What You Need to Know About Israel’s Humanitarian Aid To Gaza Fatah responds to Hamas criticism of new formation of PA government ‘without consulting Hamas’ Surprise jump in Gazan support for 2-state solution, while still in favor of Oct 7 attack Hamas' Most Horrific Weapon of War: 5 Takeaways from UN Report on Sexual Violence Against Israelis Latest Video Clips The History of Israel This Muslim Israeli Woman Is the Future of the Middle East Natasha Hausdorff responds to the content of the House of Commons Gaza Debate. Its time to face the hard truth that you're being played as a sacrificial fool by terrorists. Peace cannot be achieved with those who desire war and jihad instead. 'Awful Things Happening In Israel Nothing To Do With British Jews'

Israel Discovers Hamas Tunnels Under UNRWA Gaza Headquarters 10 February 2024 By: VOA News Israeli forces have discovered a tunnel network hundreds of meters long extending partly under UNRWA's Gaza headquarters, the military says, calling it new evidence of Hamas militants burrowing under the main relief agency for Palestinians. Israeli Army engineers took reporters with foreign news outlets through the tunnel passages. They entered a shaft next to a school on the periphery of the United Nations compound, descending to the concrete-lined tunnel. After 20 minutes of walking through the hot, narrow and occasionally winding passage, they got underneath UNRWA headquarters, according to an army lieutenant-colonel leading the tour. The military said the tunnel was 700 meters long, 18 meters deep — bifurcated at times — and it revealed side rooms. There was an office space, with steel safes that had been opened and emptied. There was a tiled toilet. One large chamber was packed with computer servers, another with industrial battery stacks. "Everything is conducted from here. All the energy for the tunnels, which you walked through them, are powered from here," said the lieutenant-colonel, who gave only his first name, Ido. Ido said Hamas militants appeared to have evacuated when Israel Defense Forces, also known as IDF, were advancing. He said they preemptively cut communications cables, which he showed, that ran through the floor of the UNRWA headquarters' basement. It appeared that heavy Israeli barrages and sustained winter rains also may have played a part in the militants' departure. Several stretches of the tunnel were clogged with dislodged sand and knee-high water. Call for UNRWA official to resign After the discovery of the tunnel, Israeli Foreign Minister Israel Katz called for the resignation of UNRWA Commissioner-General Philippe Lazzarini on a post on social media platform X. Katz dismissed Lazzarini's claim that he was unaware of the tunnel's existence as "not only absurd but also an affront to common sense." In a statement, UNRWA said it had vacated the headquarters on October 12, five days after the terror attack occurred, and was therefore "unable to confirm or otherwise comment" on the Israeli finding. "UNRWA ... does not have the military and security expertise nor the capacity to undertake military inspections of what is or might be under its premises," the statement said. This is a time of internal crisis for the U.N. relief agency, which is facing Israeli allegations that some of its staff were working for Hamas. The agency has launched its own internal probe into the claims, and several donor countries have frozen their funding. The Palestinians have accused Israel of falsifying information to tarnish UNRWA, which employs 13,000 people in the Gaza Strip and has been a lifeline for the aid-dependent population for years. The humanitarian agency runs schools, primary health care clinics and other social services, and it distributes aid. "We know that they [Hamas] have people working in UNRWA. We want every international organization to work in Gaza. That is not a problem. Our problem is the Hamas," Ido told reporters. Hamas has denied numerous and longstanding accusations that it operates in and underneath civilian facilities, such as schools and hospitals. The Israeli military did not allow journalists to take photographs of military intelligence, such as maps or certain equipment in the convoy of armored vehicles they traveled in. It also requested approval before transmission of photographs and video footage taken during the trip. <- Previous Read full article Next -> More Insights 7 Ways Hamas Exploits Palestinian Civilians in Gaza Antisemitism defined: Why opposing the Jewish people's right to self-determination is antisemitic What You Need to Know About Israel’s Humanitarian Aid To Gaza Fatah responds to Hamas criticism of new formation of PA government ‘without consulting Hamas’ Surprise jump in Gazan support for 2-state solution, while still in favor of Oct 7 attack Hamas' Most Horrific Weapon of War: 5 Takeaways from UN Report on Sexual Violence Against Israelis Latest Video Clips The History of Israel This Muslim Israeli Woman Is the Future of the Middle East Natasha Hausdorff responds to the content of the House of Commons Gaza Debate. Its time to face the hard truth that you're being played as a sacrificial fool by terrorists. Peace cannot be achieved with those who desire war and jihad instead. 'Awful Things Happening In Israel Nothing To Do With British Jews'

Gazans call for release of Israeli hostages in rare protest against Hamas 24 January 2024 By: ynet In footage shared by IDF Arabic spokesperson, group of largely women and children in central Gaza's Deir al-Balah seen chanting slogans in call for end to war. IDF Arabic Spokesperson Lieutenant Colonel Avichay Adraee posted on Wednesday footage of a rare protest against Hamas near the Shuhada al-Aqsa Hospital in Deir al-Balah, central Gaza Strip. "Hamas-ISIS leaders, led by Sinwar, listen to the cries of your people, your children and your wives expressing their anger over the situation you caused in Gaza," he wrote in a post on X (formerly Twitter) to which the video was attached. "They demand you return the Israeli hostages to end the war so they can return home. Will these cries and demands reach the hideouts of Hamas leaders?" <- Previous Read full article Next -> More Insights 7 Ways Hamas Exploits Palestinian Civilians in Gaza Antisemitism defined: Why opposing the Jewish people's right to self-determination is antisemitic What You Need to Know About Israel’s Humanitarian Aid To Gaza Fatah responds to Hamas criticism of new formation of PA government ‘without consulting Hamas’ Surprise jump in Gazan support for 2-state solution, while still in favor of Oct 7 attack Hamas' Most Horrific Weapon of War: 5 Takeaways from UN Report on Sexual Violence Against Israelis Latest Video Clips The History of Israel This Muslim Israeli Woman Is the Future of the Middle East Natasha Hausdorff responds to the content of the House of Commons Gaza Debate. Its time to face the hard truth that you're being played as a sacrificial fool by terrorists. Peace cannot be achieved with those who desire war and jihad instead. 'Awful Things Happening In Israel Nothing To Do With British Jews'

Governing Gaza and Relations with the Civilians October 7th Hamas In a Nutshell In Gaza, while Hamas maintains a base of support due to its stance against Israel and its social and religious outreach, there is also significant public discontent, fear, and frustration with their governance. Many Gazans are dissatisfied with Hamas's economic management and the consequences of its militant tactics, including the impact on civilian life and the exploitation of resources. Fear and intimidation are used by Hamas against political rivals and dissenters, creating a dangerous atmosphere for public opposition. The civilian population also suffers from Hamas's military actions, which often result in civilian casualties and destruction. Reports indicate that Hamas diverts humanitarian aid for its own use and uses civilian infrastructure for military purposes, worsening the humanitarian crisis. Additionally, there are claims of Hamas preventing civilian evacuation during IDF airstrikes, effectively using civilians as human shields. This complex relationship is furth er strained by Hamas's efforts to radicalize society, particularly the youth, and the general unpopularity of the Palestinian leadershi p, including Hamas, indicating a desire for political change among Gazans. The full story References Related Videos Full Story The Full Story While there is a base of support for Hamas in Gaza, there is also significant public discontent, fear, and frustration with their governance, economic management, and militant tactics. The relationship between Hamas and the civilians in Gaza is shaped by a combination of ideological alignment, economic hardship, fear of repression, and the impact of external conflicts. Support for Hamas: Hamas has maintained a significant base of support in Gaza. This support is often rooted in the group's stance against Israel and its commitment to Palestinian nationalism. Hamas's social services and religious outreach have also garnered support among certain segments of the population. Fear and Intimidation: Alongside support, there is also fear of Hamas among the Gazan population. Hamas has been known to use intimidation and violence against its political rivals and those who oppose its rule. This creates an atmosphere where public dissent against Hamas can be dangerous. Frustration with Governance: Many Gazans express frustration with Hamas's governance. Issues like economic hardship, restrictions on freedom, and the consequences of ongoing conflicts with Israel contribute to dissatisfaction among the population. Surveys and reports have indicated that a significant portion of Gazans are unhappy with the way Hamas has managed the region, particularly regarding its handling of economic and social issues. Many Gazans struggling to secure basic necessities. The majority attributed the lack of food to internal problems and government mismanagement rather than external sanctions, indicating a critical view of Hamas's governance. Hamas's Military Actions and Civilian Casualties: Hamas's military wing, the Izzedine al-Qassam Brigades, has been actively involved in conflicts with Israel. These conflicts often result in significant civilian casualties and destruction in Gaza, which further exacerbates the hardships faced by the civilian population. The impact of these military actions on everyday life in Gaza contributes to the complex relationship between Hamas and the civilians. Exploitation of Humanitarian Aid: Hamas has been accused of exploiting Gaza financially and in terms of resources. This includes diverting international humanitarian aid intended for the civilian population for its own use, such as redirecting food, medical supplies, and construction materials. Hamas has also been reported to use civilian infrastructure for military purposes, which not only endangers civilians but also leads to the destruction of vital resources during conflicts. These actions exacerbate the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and contribute to the suffering of the civilian Preventing Civilian Evacuation: There are claims that Hamas has actively prevented civilians from evacuating areas targeted by the IDF. The IDF often issues warnings before airstrikes to minimize civilian casualties. However, reports suggest that Hamas has countered these efforts by forcing civilians to remain in targeted areas, effectively using them as human shields. Some reports indicate that Hamas militants have shot at civilians attempting to evacuate areas before Israeli bombings. This extreme measure is purportedly used to ensure that civilians remain in targeted areas, thereby increasing the likelihood of civilian casualties during Israeli strikes. Fear and Intimidation: Hamas's use of violence and pressure on civilian populations to achieve its goals, including the promotion of a 'traditional' Islamic society, contributes to an atmosphere of fear and control within Gaza. This is compounded by the group's history of violence against both military and civilian targets. Radicalization Efforts: Hamas has invested in efforts to radicalize society, particularly targeting youth, to build support for its militant infrastructure. This includes educational and social service programs that instill a culture of resistance in Gazan society. Response to Governance and Political Rivalry: The population's response to Hamas's governance and its rivalry with Fatah reflects a complex political landscape in Gaza. The deep unpopularity of Palestinian leadership, including Hamas, suggests a desire for political change among the population. References References What Palestinians Really Think of Hamas Hamas’ use of hum an shields in Gaza Hamas' Exploitation of Humanitarian Aid Reletaed Videos Related Videos Gaza City is different. Gaza's Unfiltered Reality: The Untold Story Have you ever wondered where is all the money sent to the people of Gaza? Douglas Murray says what others are too scared to admit about Gaza Something about responsibility “We are paying the price for Hamas’s idiotic actions” Load More

UN Sec. Gen. meets Israelis freed from Hamas captivity, in Davos 18 January 2024 By: ynet Freed hostage tells World Economic Forum how she was beaten by her captors and told that she would never be free. Another said the old and infirmed would not be able to survive the conditions underground in the tunnel <- Previous Read full article Next -> More Insights 7 Ways Hamas Exploits Palestinian Civilians in Gaza Antisemitism defined: Why opposing the Jewish people's right to self-determination is antisemitic What You Need to Know About Israel’s Humanitarian Aid To Gaza Fatah responds to Hamas criticism of new formation of PA government ‘without consulting Hamas’ Surprise jump in Gazan support for 2-state solution, while still in favor of Oct 7 attack Hamas' Most Horrific Weapon of War: 5 Takeaways from UN Report on Sexual Violence Against Israelis Latest Video Clips The History of Israel This Muslim Israeli Woman Is the Future of the Middle East Natasha Hausdorff responds to the content of the House of Commons Gaza Debate. Its time to face the hard truth that you're being played as a sacrificial fool by terrorists. Peace cannot be achieved with those who desire war and jihad instead. 'Awful Things Happening In Israel Nothing To Do With British Jews'

October 7th Impact on the west Antisemitism Antisemitism in the UN & The Red Cross In a Nutshell The United Nations, particularly the General Assembly and the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC), faces criticism for a disproportionate focus on Israel. In 2022, the UN General Assembly passed 15 resolutions against Israel, compared to 13 against all other countries, continuing a trend since 2015 with 140 resolutions against Israel and only 68 against all other countries. The UNHRC, since 2006, has passed over 90 resolutions against Israel, more than those against countries with severe human rights violations like Iran, Syria, North Korea, China, Cuba, and Venezuela. This imbalance has raised concerns about the UN's objectivity in addressing global human rights issues, suggesting potential bias and double standards. Similarly, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) has been accused of bias against Israel, particularly in its response to the Gaza conflict and handling of Israeli hostages. An analysis by the Jerusalem Institute of Justice found the ICRC's social media focused disproportionately on Palestinian suffering while neglecting Israeli civilian suffering and hostages since the October 7 Hamas attack. The ICRC's failure to visit Israeli hostages or report on them being taken to Shifa Hospital in Gaza is seen as indicative of this bias. This approach impacts public perception and raises questions about the ICRC's commitment to neutrality, especially given the UN's perceived bias against Israel. These concerns challenge the credibility of these organizations in impartially addressing human rights issues and conflicts. The full story References Related Videos Full Story The Full Story Antisemitism and Bias in the UN's Approach Towards Israel The United Nations, particularly the General Assembly and the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC), has been subject to criticism for its disproportionate focus on Israel. The data extracted from the provided sources highlights this imbalance: UN General Assembly Resolutions: In 2022 alone, the UN General Assembly approved 15 resolutions that were critical of Israel, compared to just 13 resolutions criticizing all other countries. This trend is not new; since 2015, the General Assembly has adopted 140 resolutions against Israel, while only 68 resolutions have been passed against all other countries combined. This stark disparity in the number of resolutions underscores the lopsided focus on Israel. UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) Resolutions: The UNHRC has been particularly notable for its focus on Israel. Since its inception in 2006, the council has passed over 90 resolutions against Israel. This number exceeds the combined total of resolutions passed against countries known for severe human rights violations, including Iran, Syria, North Korea, China, Cuba, and Venezuela. This disproportionate attention on Israel by the UN bodies has raised significant concerns about the fairness and objectivity of the United Nations in addressing global human rights issues. The focus on Israel, often at the expense of addressing more severe human rights situations in other countries, has sparked debate and scrutiny within the international community. It raises questions about the potential bias and double standards in the UN's approach to human rights and international conflicts. Antisemitism and Bias in the Red Cross's Approach Towards Israel The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) has been accused of displaying a clear bias against Israel, particularly in its response to the situation in Gaza and its handling of Israeli hostages. This criticism stems from the ICRC's perceived inaction and lack of balanced reporting regarding the suffering of Israeli civilians and hostages in the context of the conflict with Hamas. Disproportionate Focus on Palestinian Suffering: The Jerusalem Institute of Justice conducted an analysis of the ICRC's social media following the October 7 massacre by Hamas, in which numerous Israeli civilians were murdered and kidnapped. The analysis found that the ICRC's social media channels disproportionately focused on the suffering of civilians in Gaza while ignoring the suffering of Israelis since the attack. This included a failure to mention Israeli civilians suffering on October 7 or thereafter. Neglect of Israeli Hostages: The ICRC has been scrutinized for failing to visit Israeli hostages and not reporting that the hostages had been taken to Shifa Hospital in Gaza. This lack of action and reporting on the part of the ICRC has been seen as a clear indication of bias against Israel. Impact on Public Perception: The ICRC's approach has significant consequences for the overall narrative and public understanding of the conflict. The organization's influential role in providing information necessitates a balanced and nuanced approach in its communications. However, the apparent disproportion in the ICRC's content focus has led to concerns about its commitment to neutrality and fairness. Relationship with the UN: The ICRC, while an independent humanitarian organization, often works closely with the United Nations in conflict zones. However, the UN's own perceived bias against Israel, as evidenced by the disproportionate number of resolutions against Israel in the UNHRC, may influence the ICRC's actions and public communications. In summary, the ICRC's biased behavior, as evidenced by its focus on Palestinian suffering and neglect of Israeli hostages, coupled with the UN's own biased approach against Israel, raises concerns about the impartiality of these international organizations in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. This bias undermines the credibility of these organizations in addressing human rights issues and conflicts impartially. References References UN Bias Against Israel: Fact or Fiction? UN condemned Israel more than all other countries combined in 2022 — monitor Antisemitism and Discrimination Against Israel at the United Nations Israeli group accuses Red Cross of ‘biased and apathetic’ response to Gaza hostages Red Cross shows clear anti-Israel bias, Jerusalem Institute of Justice claims Reletaed Videos Related Videos The Red Cross is taking care of everyone! Almost Natasha Hausdorff in debate at University College Dublin Who is right in the Israel Hamas conflict United Nations resolutions - Not surprising 🤦🏻♂️ UN for Palestine The Palestinians are the first victims of the Hamas. Load More

7 Ways Hamas Exploits Palestinian Civilians in Gaza 21 March 2024 By: AJC Since coming to power in a violent coup in 2007 in Gaza, the Iranian-backed Hamas terror group has systematically exploited Palestinian civilians, using them to protect their terrorist infrastructure while stealing enormous quantities of resources to build their war machine. From diverting economic resources to the endangerment of human lives, these activities not only perpetuate the suffering of the Palestinians in Gaza - representing a crime against humanity - but also give Hamas operational advantages in its war against Israel where they win not only when they kill Israeli soldiers, but also when Israel inadvertently harms Palestinian civilians. Here are seven ways Hamas exploits Gaza’s Palestinian civilians to further its genocidal aim to destroy Israel. 1. Hamas diverts critical civilian resources for its terrorism Construction materials for terror tunnels: Hamas has a long history of diverting cement and steel intended for civilian reconstruction projects for the creation of a complex terror tunnel network known as “the Metro” that runs beneath Gaza. Hamas’ tunnel network is believed to be the second largest in the world, behind North Korea, and is estimated to be around 500km (311 miles) with some 1,300 tunnels . They are equipped with rails, electricity, ventilation, communication lines, and even repurposed oxygen tanks initially sent as aid for Gazan hospitals. Ambulances as transport vehicles: Hamas uses ambulances as part of its terror operations to shield its terrorists from Israeli forces. This use of ambulances not only denies civilians who are injured the use of the ambulances but puts at risk medical workers. Everyday items for rockets: Hamas also has a history of transforming everyday items into weapons. Sewer pipes are pulled out of the ground to make rockets, and fiberglass intended to repair fishing boats is also diverted to the rocket industry. Even chemicals like castor oil and additives such as aluminum dust have been imported to produce rocket fuel, along with converting salt into a substance called AP (ammonium perchlorate for rocket fuel), using Iranian techniques. 2. Hamas steals Palestinian funds to build its terror operations The Hamas leadership steals funds intended for Palestinian civilians to build a financial empire outside the Gaza Strip worth about $700 million that supports its terror operations. Taxes to fund terrorism: In 2018 alone, Hamas made approximately half a billion dollars from taxes on goods such as gas and cigarettes coming into Gaza through the Rafah border crossing with Egypt. Instead of investing this substantial income in the welfare of Palestinian civilians, the funds go primarily to fund its terror operations, offering no vision for economic growth or improvement in living conditions. Foreign money: Nor does Hamas invest any of the tens of millions of dollars it gets from Iran every year - estimated to be about $100 million a year and split among Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, and Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine - in any civilian project, instead investing all of it towards its terror operations. 3. Hamas attacks civilian infrastructure that supports Palestinians Hamas repeatedly attacks and sabotages infrastructure set up exclusively to assist Gazans. Destroying fuel terminals: In 2018, for example, Hamas orchestrated an attack on the Kerem Shalom fuel and gas terminal— the only one that supplies the Gaza Strip. This was not a random attack; Hamas operatives divided rioters into groups with explicit instructions on which part of the crossing to target, effectively cutting off basic supplies to over two million Gazans. The rioters set parts of the cross ablaze three times, causing significant damage to critical infrastructure, including fuel pipelines and conveyor belts. Israeli authorities were forced to shut down the crossing for several days to repair it. Hamas also similarly attacked the Nahal Oz fuel crossing into Gaza in 2008 and it has remained closed since. Destroying power and water lines: Since October 7, Hamas hit nine power lines from Israel with rockets. Those lines supply more power to the Strip than the Gazan power plant does. It also shut down a water pipe leading from Israel to Gaza (although Israel only supplies 10 percent of Gaza’s water). Nevertheless, Israel opened two water pipes to Gaza, delivering nearly 30 million liters of Gaza per day since October 28. 4. Hamas deliberately puts Palestinian civilians in harm’s way Hamas advises civilians to ignore calls for evacuation from the Israel Defense Forces, intentionally putting them in harm’s way. This tactic places military targets next to civilian populations, creating both operational and public relations advantages for Hamas. It leverages the ethical dilemma faced by the Israel Defense Forces, which seeks to minimize civilian casualties and, unlike Hamas, distinguishes between civilians and combatants. Blocking civilian evacuations: Since October 7, the IDF has made available recordings of calls with Gazan civilians who report how Hamas regime vehicles and terrorists actively blocked the passage of those seeking to comply with Israeli evacuation calls to move south and were told to turn back. While some 750,000 Gazans were able to evacuate – representing a clear vote of no confidence in their regime – many struggled to get past Hamas’ blocking efforts. Hamas has also been blocking foreign nations from leaving Gaza. Currently, it is believed there are 200 British and 600 American citizens in the Gaza Strip. 5. Hamas rockets kill Palestinians Hamas’ failed rockets present a clear and present danger to Gazan civilians. On October 17, an explosion at Gaza's Al-Ahli hospital led to a significant number of casualties. A subsequent investigation by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) exposed the Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) as the responsible party for the failed rocket launch that resulted in the disaster. Between October 7 and October 17, some 450 rockets aimed at Israel have misfired and landed within Gaza itself, imperiling its own residents. In May, during an escalation between Israel and PIJ, some 25% of rockets failed and fell in Gaza, in some cases killing civilians. 7. Hamas imperils Gaza’s schools, hospitals, and mosques The Hamas ‘Metro’ tunnels aren’t just hidden away in remote locations; they're strategically placed underneath hospitals, schools, mosques, and UNRWA sites. This not only threatens those places with terrorist activity but also undermines the building’s foundations and stability, making them prone to collapse. Terror hubs under hospitals: Shifa Hospital in Gaza City, for instance, is not just the Gaza Strip’s largest medical facility. It also serves as a command-and-control hub for Hamas, complete with a network of terror tunnels and various entrances within the hospital premises. Hamas operates its command and control centers in different departments of the hospital. A Hamas terrorist confirmed that the terror group specifically uses hospitals and medical clinics as cover for its operations because they know Israel won’t target them. Rockets under schools: In Operation Protective Edge in 2014 between Hamas and Israel, UNRWA announced that it discovered rockets hidden in a vacant school in the Gaza Strip. The school is situated between two other UNRWA schools that each accommodate 1,500 internally displaced persons. UNRWA said it was the second time that this had happened. 7. Hamas manipulates the media Hamas also sways international media by framing the conflict in a manner that obscures its exploitation of Palestinian civilians. Tragic stories of dead Palestinians often make headlines without the context that many were intentionally placed in harm's way due to Hamas's tactics. The Hamas-controlled Palestinian Health Ministry in Gaza synchronizes all of its media statements with the Hamas terrorist leaders, thereby serving as a propaganda mouthpiece. Gaza hospital explosion: The recent example of the explosion at the Al-Ahli Arab Hospital in Gaza City highlighted how Hamas manipulates foreign media into its narrative. Several international media organizations initially cited in their coverage statistics provided by the Hamas-run Palestinian Health Ministry. For example, the New York Times ran with the headline, “Israeli Strike Kills Hundreds in Hospital, Palestinians Say.” The Ministry had falsely claimed within a short time of the blast that an Israeli airstrike killed 500 Palestinians at the hospital, as part of Hamas’s media strategy of demonizing Israel’s efforts to protect Israeli civilians. The use of statistics provided by Hamas-run agencies in Gaza often plays into the terror group’s propaganda efforts to lay the blame on Israel for civilian deaths in Gaza. The New York Times eventually apologized for publishing the headline, acknowledging that its coverage of the incident should have been more rigorous. President Joe Biden reportedly blasted the headline from the New York Times , saying that it “was irresponsible and could have triggered military escalation in the Middle East.” <- Previous Read full article Next -> More Insights 7 Ways Hamas Exploits Palestinian Civilians in Gaza Antisemitism defined: Why opposing the Jewish people's right to self-determination is antisemitic What You Need to Know About Israel’s Humanitarian Aid To Gaza Fatah responds to Hamas criticism of new formation of PA government ‘without consulting Hamas’ Surprise jump in Gazan support for 2-state solution, while still in favor of Oct 7 attack Hamas' Most Horrific Weapon of War: 5 Takeaways from UN Report on Sexual Violence Against Israelis Latest Video Clips The History of Israel This Muslim Israeli Woman Is the Future of the Middle East Natasha Hausdorff responds to the content of the House of Commons Gaza Debate. Its time to face the hard truth that you're being played as a sacrificial fool by terrorists. Peace cannot be achieved with those who desire war and jihad instead. 'Awful Things Happening In Israel Nothing To Do With British Jews'

Terror cell planning ‘imminent attack’ killed in West Bank drone strike, IDF says 17 January 2024 By: Times of Israel Military says squad leader targeted in Balata camp received financing and instructions from Iran; soldier seriously wounded; another strike carried out in Tulkarem <- Previous Read full article Next -> More Insights 7 Ways Hamas Exploits Palestinian Civilians in Gaza Antisemitism defined: Why opposing the Jewish people's right to self-determination is antisemitic What You Need to Know About Israel’s Humanitarian Aid To Gaza Fatah responds to Hamas criticism of new formation of PA government ‘without consulting Hamas’ Surprise jump in Gazan support for 2-state solution, while still in favor of Oct 7 attack Hamas' Most Horrific Weapon of War: 5 Takeaways from UN Report on Sexual Violence Against Israelis Latest Video Clips The History of Israel This Muslim Israeli Woman Is the Future of the Middle East Natasha Hausdorff responds to the content of the House of Commons Gaza Debate. Its time to face the hard truth that you're being played as a sacrificial fool by terrorists. Peace cannot be achieved with those who desire war and jihad instead. 'Awful Things Happening In Israel Nothing To Do With British Jews'